Education at all levels should be free for all people

Eduaction is one of the most important parts in a nation's development. It can cultivate all professions that we really need, people should learn new knowledge and skills from school and become professions in every field to have influence on peoples life and make it better. When people need education, should they pay or not? Are there any disadavatages and adavantages if education is all free for every person?

When children grow up to the age of being educated, most parents hope for them to attend a better school with higher tuition fees, as a matter of fact, the children in the rich family can receive a high standard of education, in contrast, the children in the family with lower social and econimical status just have some ordinary educational experiences, if they need to compete with the wealthy students, they probabaly lose. Basically, the high or low standard of education you experience depends on the wealth of the family. However, people should pay more taxes to government into fundings if all education is free, even the higher education. The advantage of free education is equal oppurtunities to be given the high standard of education for students with different background. Everybody will love to study further for the degree of master or Ph. d, and do research for making better life of people.

In my opinion, I deeply agree that education at all levels should be free for all people. Because I think the higher education people can receive that indicate the countries develop better. Maybe there are taxes problem for some people, but government should make a rule about taxes not to cause the economical pressure for the persons with financial problems. Besides that, government sholud pay more attention to teacher education, I truely beleive that if you want a excellent students, you must have exce;ent teachers.

All education should be free if the government make some policy to prevent the impossible problems. Free education wolud be a wonderful social welfare for the people of the country.

The publics attitude towards celebrities

What is the publics atiitude towards the celebrities? There are 3 aspects to describe the attitude: curiosity, admiration and criticsim.

First of all, people always are curious about the private life of celebrities. especially affection, marriage, chilren and familly etc., even the publics know they are doing the ordinary life just like normal people, but because of the fame, everybody like to know. That's why paparazzi, gossip magazines and TV progarms appeared with high rate of consumption, the information of media thrusted upon people to watch it.

Second, people admire the celebrities especially they adore and envy. The fans dream to be the person they like and try to learn the clothing, sing their songs and follow the each news, goupies think the most important thing is the news of famous peoeple in the world, they pursuit the "role model" all the time to the craziness. Some unpricipled fans can't distinct between the good and bad role model, they just blind to worship then with some ridiculous reasons especially teenagers, if too serous, it could destroy their life.

Third, some critical person when they read some information about the celebrities, they feel jealousnad criticise all the time, such as:the famous people are too rich, don't behave well, just good looking without any thinking etc., but actually, I think the the greater the person critise, the more hope they want to be famous, because they don't have the wealth and fame of the celebrities, but they really want to be.

Regardless of attitudes of curiosty, admiration and criticism, I think we still have to reverence the private life of the celebrities and to be skptic of the gossip news, those news need to be scrutinized, should not beleieve it easily. Finally, don't forget the celebrities are just normal person, they also need food, friends and sleep like the nobody of us.